Tantra on Taking Birth and Parenting
Continuing to Investigate Ancient Insights Applied to Modern Living
Hello everyone, today’s essay came from a question in my weekly Living Tantra course, and it was worthy of this deeper dive. This orientation to the self as an ongoing soul process that transcends lifetimes is held by billions of people worldwide. If you’re parenting (or re-parenting yourself), you may find some gems. Also, this week’s podcast with Lixuan An on True Freedom is live. All Love, Christine
Why This Child, These Parents
The tantric traditions (Kashmir Shaivism, Tamil Siddhānta, and the broader Vedic understanding of karma) hold the specific view that one’s birth isn’t random, nor is it imposed. The soul arrives into a particular family because that family provides the precise karmic conditions needed for this lifetime’s soul work.1
The teaching on prarabdha karma says that from the vast accumulated store of everything sown across many lifetimes (sanchita) a portion ripens and becomes active in each incarnation. This ripened portion shapes the circumstances of birth: the body, the time, the culture, the family. The soul enters into life through those parents whose karmic field matches what this soul needs to experience, resolve, and potentially transmute.2
Unfortunately, once we incarnate, we don’t have transparent access to the architecture of our own prarabdha, we infer it over time and with practices of self awareness. The teaching is to be held as a contemplative orientation, something to move toward as understanding opens, rather than a preemptive conclusion before the work (of grief, anger, and the clear-eyed accounting of what was genuinely harmful) have been done. The insights of prarabdha are a frame available after our reckoning, to help us understand things in our lives, not instead of it. And it is never a teaching to apply to someone else’s suffering. We don’t use it karmic understanding to bypass accountability or mercy.
Held rightly, this teaching offers us an understanding that the match between child and parent has a deeper coherence than accident. The child who needed to develop fierce self-reliance arrived where self-reliance would be required. The child who came to work through a particular pattern of love and distance arrived into exactly that field. The parent, too, is changed by the child they receive and called forward by this particular soul in ways no other could produce. There is a perfect precision in this.
The Unique Essence: The Divine Child
Each soul arrives with its own nature a specific frequency, a particular quality of intelligence, a way of attending to the world that belongs to it alone. In Kashmir Shaivism this is svābhāva: one’s own being, one’s inherent nature.3 It precedes the family and other social conditioning, and is what remains when the layers of adaptation are peeled back. As yogi Mark Whitwell puts it: every child is the natural beauty and intelligence of the cosmos arriving to form.4
Patrick Connor speaks of this innate nature as “The Divine Child” — the state of joy, curiosity, and openness that is the soul’s natural register. This is the dimension of the self wired for expansion, for discovery, for full aliveness. Learning in this state is effortless. The stillness this child inhabits is not the stillness of shutdown, but rather full, alive and open to wonder. Every child, every animal, knows the vibration of the people around them before they have words for it. They feel the field directly and respond to the energies they are immersed in.
Children show their svābhāva early and clearly, before the world has had much time to work on them. The one inexplicably drawn to music before anyone taught them to value it. The one who is tender with animals, or who asks the questions adults have learned to stop asking. The one whose joy, when fully expressed, has a quality unlike anyone else’s joy. This is the soul making itself known.
The work of a parent (and later, of the person themselves) is in large part to protect this essence, recognize it, and clear away whatever has accumulated over it. The svābhāva isn’t fragile. But it can go quiet, protected and wait in the wings.
The Usual Conditions: The Original Bargain
Patrick also describes this: the world most children arrive into is organized, to varying degrees, around conditions. Love is available but often tied to behavior, to achievement, to a shape that works for the adults in the room.
Some children, particularly those who are sensitive, develop what might be called psychic vigilance: they tune into the emotional field of their caregivers early and learn to adjust their own behavior to calm things down.6 The exuberant child learns the exuberance is too much. The child who grieves loudly learns to grieve in private. The one who is wildly joyful discovers that joy needs to be managed, contained, rationed.
Before conscious thought is possible, a bargain gets struck: connection requires self-diminishment. To be loved, I must be less. My fullness is too much for the people I need. This is the deep wiring of the original bargain7 : the belief that being fully oneself won’t bring connection, that connection is found on a different path, best reached by compromising one’s own essence.
There is often a current of loyalty embedded in this. A child who grows up around people who are suffering can absorb the sense that it is wrong, even cruel, to be joyful when those closest to them are in pain. The suffering gets equated with love. Ease begins to feel like a form of abandonment. This loyalty to the parent’s pain isn’t conscious, rather it is an act of love by a small person who had no other tools. But it travels.
The bargain also runs deeper than the personal. The wound moves through generations not because people are broken but because it was never brought to light. What the adults haven’t worked through, the children carry, often without knowing it belongs to someone else.8
The Alternative We Are Invited To
The invitation isn’t to be a perfect parent. The invitation is to be a conscious one. To be awake to the bargain you were given, willing to examine which parts of it are still running, and a parent who is genuinely interested in meeting the child in front of you rather than the child you expected or needed them to be.
Central to this is a question the tradition puts directly: what if connection could arise from being fully, unapologetically yourself? What if the Divine Child within you (yes YOU, Mom or Dad), was playful, authentic, fully alive and safe to be seen and celebrated? What if that fullness, rather than a threat to love, was actually the key to the deepest connections you seek?9
This is the unwinding of the original bargain. It runs in both directions: toward the child in front of you, and toward the child you once were.
To the degree that we are strict, narrow, and rigid with ourselves, we will be the same with those in our care. The spaciousness we cultivate inside becomes the spaciousness we offer.
This also means releasing the model of love as reward and punishment. This model gets absorbed early and often gets projected onto God or the universe: the sense that what I really want, some authority will decide I am too much for wanting. Children raised in spacious, unconditional love develop a different relationship to desire — they bring their wishes forward. They believe the world is basically hospitable to their aliveness.
Learning reflects this too. Learning is natural and joyful until we make it heavy by organizing it around evaluation and the threat of failure. The parent who frames life’s lessons as adventure, who meets a child’s curiosity with genuine delight rather than anxious assessment, keeps that natural love of discovery alive longer.
You Can’t Get It Wrong With Good Effort
Good news for the anxious parents among us! The child is resilient. The relationship is resilient. Repair is built into the architecture of close relationship, and children don’t need a flawless parent: they need a real one.
Developmental research on attachment is clear on this: it isn’t the ruptures that determine the outcome, it is the repairs.10 The parent who loses their temper and then returns, acknowledges, reconnects is teaching that rupture doesn’t end love. You can hurt someone and come back and be met.
The child who grows up watching a parent take genuine accountability (not self-flagellation, but honest acknowledgment and returning) learns that imperfection is workable. Humans make mistakes and the world holds. Effort, honesty, and the willingness to repair are more important than perfection.
Resonance and Your Own Work
The most important thing a parent can offer isn’t a method. It is a state. Children attune to the field around them before they process language. The nervous system reads safety and danger, love and its absence, genuine ease and performed ease. The internal state of the caregiver is the primary environment. Everything else is conducted within that field.
The parent’s own healing is therefore not separate from their parenting. It is parenting. Until we walk the path of our own self-understanding, we inadvertently transmit our hidden fears, prejudices, and unresolved emotions. That’s how fields work.11 Every fear you face and release, every inherited pattern you bring to consciousness, every expansion of your own capacity for presence, reaches your child directly. They witness your courage and find permission to awaken their own.
Resonance is the word for this: the child’s system settles in the presence of a parent whose system is settled.
Imperfectly Perfect Presence: With Yourself, Your Co-Parent, and Your Child
With yourself:
Know your own triggers and fears. When something your child does activates a strong reaction in you, pause and ask: is this about them, or is this older? Named fear can be worked with. Unnamed fear acts through you.
Examine your relationship to joy. Notice where ease feels dangerous, where receiving good things produces guilt, where difficulty has become quietly equated with love or worthiness. These are places the original bargain is still running, and they will surface when you try to let your child be freely happy. Working them in yourself is working them for the line.
Cultivate some practice that returns you to your own body and presence — breath, movement, contemplation, time in nature. Forgive yourself generously and often. The mistakes will come. The return is what matters.
With your co-parent:
The co-parenting relationship is a field the child lives in. Children feel the tension between adults even when nothing is said. Genuine respect and a shared commitment to the child’s wellbeing gives the child a stable ground.
Where there is real conflict, work to contain it away from the child. Find the areas of common ground and operate from there. Speak well of the other parent in the child’s presence wherever you honestly can. The child is made of both of you. What diminishes the other touches the child.
With your child:
Give them your attention without an agenda. Regularly, simply, and without your phone: what are you making, thinking, wondering about? Where did you feel most yourself today? This quality of presence tells the child they are real, known, worth time.
Let them feel the full range of what they feel, including the difficult emotions. Receive their anger without retaliation, their sadness without rushing to fix it, their fear without communicating that their fear is a problem for you. The child who discovers that their inner life is survivable develops a sense of inner safety that holds them through adulthood.
Celebrate what they love — with genuine delight in who they specifically are. Let the Divine Child in them see that it is welcome. Give them room to be loud, exuberant, inconvenient, and free. Resist the impulse to manage the joy.
When you get it wrong, say so simply and return. The repair is a vital modeling.
Know this: the soul who arrived in your care chose well. They came to a parent who is trying, paying attention, wanting to do right by them. Trust that intelligence.
Notes
1. The framework of soul incarnation into karmically fitted conditions is found across the Vedic traditions. For the Śiva view, see Kshmarāja, Pratyabhijñāhṛdayam (The Heart of Recognition) on the soul’s descent through the tattvas into individual embodiment. For Tamil Śiva Siddhānta, see Tirumular, Tirumantiram, verses on the soul (paśu), its bonds (pāśa), and the Lord’s grace (pati) as the structure of incarnate life.
2. The three-karma framework — sanchita, prarabdha, kriyāmāna — appears across the Upanishads and is systematized in the Yoga Vasistha. The formulation that prarabdha selects conditions “most suited to spiritual evolution at the time” appears in Swami Sivananda, Karma and Disease (Divine Life Society, 1952). For the soul’s entry into karmically fitted parents, see Sant Keshavadas in traditional commentaries on the soul’s entry into the womb.
Sanchita Karma (Accumulated): The vast, stored warehouse of actions, good and bad, from all past lives. It remains dormant until “sown” and activated.
Prarabdha Karma (Activated/Ripe): The specific portion of Sanchita karma assigned to be experienced in the present life, constituting one’s destiny, family, and major circumstances. It cannot be avoided, only experienced.
Kriyāmāna Karma (Current/Actionable): The actions performed in the current life that generate new karma, shaping both the remainder of the current life and future lives. It is sometimes called Agami karma.
3. Svābhāva as the soul’s own irreducible nature appears throughout Sanskrit philosophical literature. In the Trika context, see Abhinavagupta, Tantrāloka, Chapter 1, on the individual soul as a contracted expression of Śiva-consciousness retaining its essential freedom (svātantrya). See also Swami Lakshmanjoo, Kashmir Shaivism: The Secret Supreme (Universal Shaiva Fellowship, 1985).
4. Mark Whitwell, oral teaching. Whitwell is a contemporary yoga teacher, student of T.K.V. Desikachar, and heir to the Krishnamacharya lineage. This formulation is drawn from his ongoing public teaching.
5. The Divine Child as a named teaching is synthesized from conversations with Patrick Connor, 2022–2025. The underlying principle has resonance with Trika teachings on śaktipatа (transmission of grace through field and contact) as discussed in the Tantrāloka, Chapter 13.
6. The concept of the child’s psychic vigilance — attuning to the caregiver’s emotional field and adjusting behavior to regulate the relational field — is drawn from the developmental literature and is consistent with contemporary attachment research (see footnote 10).
7. The “original bargain” is synthesized from conversations with Patrick Connor, 2022–2025. It is consistent with the Trika understanding of āṇavamala (the root contraction of the individuated self) and its expression in relational patterning. See Kshmarāja, Pratyabhijñāhṛdayam, Sutra 16.
8. The transgenerational transmission of unresolved emotional material is addressed in contemporary trauma research. See Mark Wolynn, It Didn’t Start with You (Viking, 2016), which synthesizes epigenetic and psychological research on inherited trauma patterns.
9. Synthesized from conversations with Patrick Connor, 2022–2025. This formulation — that authentic self-expression is the ground of genuine connection rather than its obstacle — is a core teaching of his lineage work.
10. John Bowlby, Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1 (Basic Books, 1969); Mary Ainsworth et al., Patterns of Attachment (Erlbaum, 1978). For the emphasis on repair as the determinative factor in secure attachment, see Ed Tronick’s Still Face research and Daniel J. Siegel and Mary Hartzell, Parenting from the Inside Out (Tarcher/Penguin, 2003).
11. The principle that a parent’s own work is the primary transmission to their child draws on two streams: the Trika understanding of the teacher’s field as teaching (see Swami Lakshmanjoo, Kashmir Shaivism: The Secret Supreme, Chapter 6) and contemporary developmental science (Daniel Siegel, The Developing Mind, Guilford Press, 1999).
Sources and Lineage
Contemporary lineage teachings attributed to Patrick Connor are drawn from direct conversations and oral transmission, 2022–2025. Mark Whitwell’s teaching is cited from oral transmission within his ongoing public work in the Krishnamacharya lineage.
The tantric teachings referenced in this essay draw primarily from Kashmir Shaivism (Trika), transmitted through the line of Vasugupta (c. 800 CE), Abhinavagupta (c. 975–1025 CE), and Kshmarāja (c. 1000–1050 CE), and revived in the modern era through Swami Lakshmanjoo (1907–1991). The second is Tamil Śiva Siddhānta, whose primary scriptural source is Tirumular’s Tirumantiram (7th–8th century CE).
The treatment of the kañcukas (the five limiting conditions through which consciousness contracts into individuality) follows Abhinavagupta’s Tantrāloka and Sir John Woodroffe’s The Garland of Letters (Varṇamālā, Ganesh & Co., 1922) as a secondary exposition. The suggestion that the family environment is the medium through which the kañcukas take their specific personal form is a conceptual interpretation bridging classical ontology and contemporary application, it isn’t a direct textual claim and should be read as such.
California April 2-5 for Mysteries, Medicine and Mantra.
Portugal May 17-27 for a deep dive Bhakti Tantra Immersion. 1 spot remaining.
Join Adam June 14-22 for Pilgrimage to the Sacred Sites of France.
